Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > AU Falcon.com.au

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15-03-2013, 07:20 PM   #1
KR1STO
Just another mock-up..
 
KR1STO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In an AU Fairlane somewhere...
Posts: 9,966
Default Power limit of S2/3 XR8 headers.

Hey guys,
Just wanting to know how much power you can achieve when using standard S2/3 XR8 extractors before they become too restrictive on the engine..

Cheers

__________________
Desire isn't driven by the heart, the mind or the wallet.
Desire comes from another place.
It's created by the smell of burnt fuel under full throttle and the look a car gives you when you're washing it alone at night...

see my car here:
Built my own TL50!!!

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
KR1STO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-03-2013, 12:42 PM   #2
auIILTD
5.6L x 2 pilot
Donating Member2
 
auIILTD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canbra
Posts: 15,030
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: For the effort put into the Australia day cruise to Albury Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: AU Tech article. 
Default Re: Power limit of S2/3 XR8 headers.

Not sure about an exact power figure Kris, but I have heard that if you open up the ends to 2.5", there are some good gains to be had.

Stu
__________________
2002 AU II LTD

5.6L 342ci T3 Short, AFR165 heads, Comp XE270HR-12 Cam, Brembo 4/4s(355/330), T3 5 spokes, LC-1 wideband, Whiteline HD swaybars, TCE 3K Hi Stall, PWR Auto Trans Cooler, Koni shocks, King Low Springs, Hurricane headers, 100 cpsi cats, Twin 2.5" exhaust.

Quarter Mile: 13.73 @ 105.86mph


Runner Up NA/DA to BF Fairlane/LTD Geelong AFD 2024

2002 XR8 pursuit 250

Custom twin 2.5" exhaust w Herrod modifed extractors, Tuned with Moates QH
auIILTD is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-03-2013, 04:49 PM   #3
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default Re: Power limit of S2/3 XR8 headers.

I think they're restrictive all the time.

The dude that made my headers pretty much laughed at them and said bin em'.

4-1's aren't as good as a well made tri-y at the best of times, but when they're that short...

They were made like that because they're cheap.
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 16-03-2013, 11:57 PM   #4
FGII-XR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
FGII-XR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Salamander Bay
Posts: 5,427
Default Re: Power limit of S2/3 XR8 headers.

Although they aren't perfect many people forget what the windsors had in the old days, the cast iron manifold of yesteryear were awful and made the modern headers look like performance exhaust manifolds. they will work well enough for most street applications and only show their limitations when you start to push the power up
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sox View Post
I think they're restrictive all the time.

The dude that made my headers pretty much laughed at them and said bin em'.

4-1's aren't as good as a well made tri-y at the best of times, but when they're that short...

They were made like that because they're cheap.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Everyone starts off with a bag full of luck and an empty bag of experience. The trick is to fill the experience bag before the luck bag is empty.

"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt."

Start a new career as a bus driver

Rides:
FG2 XR6 stock at this stage but a very nice ride

xc 4 DOOR X CHASER 5.8 UNDER RESTO
FGII-XR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-03-2013, 07:18 AM   #5
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default Re: Power limit of S2/3 XR8 headers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by au3xr6 View Post
Although they aren't perfect many people forget what the windsors had in the old days, the cast iron manifold of yesteryear were awful and made the modern headers look like performance exhaust manifolds. they will work well enough for most street applications and only show their limitations when you start to push the power up
I haven't forgotten what the old log exhaust manifolds were like, I had enough of em' on Clevos. Terrible things.

Yes, these new headers are vastly improved on those old things, however let's not forget there's still considerable room for improvement.

I have to strongly disagree about the power limitation.
They don't scavenge nearly as good as a well made tri-Y, and are a limitation even on a standard engine.
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-03-2013, 02:58 PM   #6
auIILTD
5.6L x 2 pilot
Donating Member2
 
auIILTD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canbra
Posts: 15,030
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: For the effort put into the Australia day cruise to Albury Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: AU Tech article. 
Default Re: Power limit of S2/3 XR8 headers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sox View Post
I haven't forgotten what the old log exhaust manifolds were like, I had enough of em' on Clevos. Terrible things.

Yes, these new headers are vastly improved on those old things, however let's not forget there's still considerable room for improvement.

I have to strongly disagree about the power limitation.
They don't scavenge nearly as good as a well made tri-Y, and are a limitation even on a standard engine.
From first hand experience, I will confirm what Sox is saying. On my relatively stock (CAI only) 185kw stock engine, moving to Hurricane Tri-Ys made a vast improvement. Response down low was greatly improved and improved pulling through the mid range.

I sold my factory headers and cats for about $300 iirc. .

Stu
__________________
2002 AU II LTD

5.6L 342ci T3 Short, AFR165 heads, Comp XE270HR-12 Cam, Brembo 4/4s(355/330), T3 5 spokes, LC-1 wideband, Whiteline HD swaybars, TCE 3K Hi Stall, PWR Auto Trans Cooler, Koni shocks, King Low Springs, Hurricane headers, 100 cpsi cats, Twin 2.5" exhaust.

Quarter Mile: 13.73 @ 105.86mph


Runner Up NA/DA to BF Fairlane/LTD Geelong AFD 2024

2002 XR8 pursuit 250

Custom twin 2.5" exhaust w Herrod modifed extractors, Tuned with Moates QH
auIILTD is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL