Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28-10-2010, 06:53 PM   #1
csv8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
csv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Q..10kms west of Rocky...
Posts: 8,303
Smile QLD Ethanol petrol mandate suspended

Ethanol petrol mandate suspended
Jessica Marszalek
October 28, 2010 - 11:48AM
A plan to force large petrol companies to include ethanol in their fuel in Queensland has been suspended.

Treasurer Andrew Fraser said the plan, proposed in 2006, would have required retailers with 10 or more sites to include five per cent ethanol in their fuel from December 31.

Under the mandate, regular unleaded petrol could have also been sold, and smaller retailers would not have been affected.

Mr Fraser said the plan was devised at a time when tax arrangements were firmly in favour of domestic ethanol.

But the federal government planned to progressively close that gap, subjecting both domestic and imported ethanol to the same 12.5 cents per litre excise by 2020, he said.

That could see the Queensland policy being frustrated with the mandate being met through imported ethanol, Mr Fraser said.

He said groups were split on the mandate and the public benefit test had concluded the proposal to be essentially neutral.

"The government has therefore resolved to suspend the implementation of the ethanol mandate," he said.

"The initial suspension will be in place for at least 12 months."

Mr Fraser said the suspension did not detract from the government's commitment to renewable fuels but its idea did need reconsideration.

AAP
What??QLD finally does something right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

__________________
CSGhia
csv8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-10-2010, 08:11 PM   #2
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default

Ah so that is the reason they have given.

It was neutral in the "public benefit" test.

"public benefit" is a rough translation of "state government revenue"
flappist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-10-2010, 09:39 PM   #3
SSD-85
Donating Member
Donating Member1
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,026
Default

Something for us to think about while the QRN IPO sneaks through....
SSD-85 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-10-2010, 10:54 PM   #4
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty85
Something for us to think about while the QRN IPO sneaks through....
Yeh, I had a train set when I was a child.

Of course if it came will all the land you could make some bloody good high speed road on either side of the tracks. No tight corners or steep hills....
flappist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-10-2010, 11:25 PM   #5
SSD-85
Donating Member
Donating Member1
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,026
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flappist
Yeh, I had a train set when I was a child.

Of course if it came will all the land you could make some bloody good high speed road on either side of the tracks. No tight corners or steep hills....
Too true Flappy, and we could "take care" of the little stooges who throw rocks at the train in the process

Ah the fabled dream of a madman.
SSD-85 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-10-2010, 12:43 AM   #6
trippytaka
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
trippytaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,421
Default

Grrr... ethanol is not an environmentally friendly, or sustainable option anyway. Look at the amount of good food-producing land it takes up to grow the crops, let alone the energy and emissions created to grow it, process it and transport it. Grrr...
trippytaka is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-10-2010, 01:14 PM   #7
excopau
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trippytaka
Grrr... ethanol is not an environmentally friendly, or sustainable option anyway. Look at the amount of good food-producing land it takes up to grow the crops, let alone the energy and emissions created to grow it, process it and transport it. Grrr...

Actually you are wrong, it depends on the government, ethanol is greener then oil out of ground, if the australian government backed the sugar cane farmers. Sugar cane is the best for ethanol production per acerage of land, and sugar cane is in abuduce in australia. But our government is dumb, all you have to do is go to brazil and have a look at there industry of ethanol made form sugar cane. It ends up being cheaper then oil and greener and gives your own country jobs instead of overseas.
excopau is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-10-2010, 01:45 PM   #8
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,794
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by excopau
Actually you are wrong, it depends on the government, ethanol is greener then oil out of ground, if the australian government backed the sugar cane farmers. Sugar cane is the best for ethanol production per acerage of land, and sugar cane is in abuduce in australia. But our government is dumb, all you have to do is go to brazil and have a look at there industry of ethanol made form sugar cane. It ends up being cheaper then oil and greener and gives your own country jobs instead of overseas.

The current E10 fuel is subsidised by the government. So what more do you expect them to do?
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-10-2010, 04:29 PM   #9
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by excopau
Actually you are wrong, it depends on the government, ethanol is greener then oil out of ground, if the australian government backed the sugar cane farmers. Sugar cane is the best for ethanol production per acerage of land, and sugar cane is in abuduce in australia. But our government is dumb, all you have to do is go to brazil and have a look at there industry of ethanol made form sugar cane. It ends up being cheaper then oil and greener and gives your own country jobs instead of overseas.
Ethanol is green, unfortunately Australia is BROWN or have you not seen all the drought issues we have and have had since settlement.

All the tree hugging and climate change spin doctoring in the universe will not turn the most arid continent on earth into the garden of eden.
flappist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 07:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL