Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > Non Ford Related Community Forums > The Bar

The Bar For non Automotive Related Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14-11-2006, 04:16 AM   #31
sprjenkins
Spr Jenkins
 
sprjenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 597
Default

Ok, its the responsibility of the stronger party, in this case telstra, to inform the weaker party of any onerous terms in the contract, the terms being the excessively high fee for WAP usage.

If you can prove this, and make a reasonable case that the details of WAP usage was an onerous term of the contract then you may have a case and the contract will not be binding.

It used to be that the signature on a contract was the only factor and buyer beware but this was overturned in Lestrange vs Graucob for anyone seriously interested.

The law now focuses on consumer protection. If you can show that you had no way of knowing about the WAP usage fees then you will probably win.

Go speak to a lawyer that focuses on contract law, they will be able to tell you in ten minutes whether you can fight it in court.
sprjenkins is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-11-2006, 04:52 AM   #32
sprjenkins
Spr Jenkins
 
sprjenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 597
Default

What the courts use to determine what is an onerous term is what a reasonable person would think if in that situation.

In this case you could argue that because you weren't charged for the first months usage of the WAP, and you had no way of knowing that you would be charged otherwise, that it would be reasonable in that situation to assume that it was free.

Therefore it was onerous for Telstra to charge you for WAP, without first notifying you that it would do so.

Telco's aren't stupid, they do things like this because more people just pay up then fight it. A good lawyer should just be able to make a quick phone call to Telstra and make it go away if you have a case.
sprjenkins is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-11-2006, 08:30 AM   #33
sgt_doofey
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
sgt_doofey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Barossa Valley, South Australia
Posts: 3,381
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Outbackjack
Is there still such a thing as the telecomunication ombudsman?? That is where I would be heading.
http://www.tio.com.au/

Would probably be the best place to start. That way he can relate his story and find out what his best plan of action is.
__________________
Cheers,
Sam.
sgt_doofey is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-11-2006, 09:06 AM   #34
cArSiK
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny
It's a very expensive ****. Thats for sure...
bwwwwhahahhaahahahahaah thats GOLD!!!!!!!!!!! :
cArSiK is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-11-2006, 09:47 AM   #35
pecker73
Falcon Addict
 
pecker73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Searching for ANOTHER Ice Pack....
Posts: 394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny
It's a very expensive ****. Thats for sure...

Hell Yeah...$11k

Must have been walking around with a woody for a week !! : : :
__________________
:eclipsee_ :eclipsee_ sleep: sleep: :eclipsee_ :eclipsee_ :eclipsee_ :eclipsee_ :eclipsee_

DAILY-2006 BF Falcon XR6 Turbo Sedan. 6 Speed Auto.

1/4 Mile......13.84sec/103.38Mph BF XR6T with an official 211.0 rwkw :
pecker73 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-11-2006, 10:12 AM   #36
EA2BA
PM me if you want
 
EA2BA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pk Ranger Modding - QLD 👍
Posts: 7,498
Default

The phone call and setup would have been recorded so to prove he understood exactley what he was getting, I doubt he has much recourse to get out of paying the bill, he cant enter an arrangement to pay it off, but at the end of the day the Telco would have had to buy the service he used so it has cost them money, even at half that they would still be out of pocket if they wiped the debt.

I highly doubt they are going to say oh sorry about that you didnt reliase here let me wipe that for you.

Some arguement could be made that a new customer should have been notified earlier as to the usage on the phone and possible ability to pay the impending bill, but I don't see this as much of an arguement at the end of the day.
Quote:
I might be wrong but I thought they needed to send a Product Disclosure to the client?
So the Telco say they did send it, he never followed up on not receiving it then, ignorance is unfortunately no excuse.
__________________
Owner of first ever car to retrofit BA SSS - the EA2BA

Send me a PM if you want to know anything

2010 Ford Ranger PK High Rider (Auto) - 2011 Ford Fiesta (Auto)
EA2BA is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-11-2006, 10:33 AM   #37
merlin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
merlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,974
Default

I hate how people take these things to A Current Affair - and then they play the evil music whilst talking about the "big bad corporations" and hash quotes together. Then all the bogans and geriatrichs at home jump up and down and yell "bloody rip off, corporate greed!" ect.

Funny that the only person to blame is your friend who didn't read the contract, and ASSUMED that he could just download endless gigabytes for nothing. I mean c'mon when does common sense prevail, and we say hey it was this guys fault not Telstra. Telstra is a business whos goal is to make a profit - they have very limited responsibilities in telling dumb people how to manage their money.

Having said that I think you perosnally have a very good attitude to the situation and just want to help out a mate so no offense meant. All he can do is speak directly to a manager and try and negotiate a solution, if that fails seek legal advice though I doubt there is any avenue to pursue there.
__________________
1966 Ford Mustang coupe. 347 stroker, PA reverse manual C4, TCE high stall converter, B&M Pro Ratchet, Edelbrock alum heads, Edelbrock intake manifold, MSD ignition, Holley Street HP 750 CFM carb, gilmer drive, wrapped Hooker Super Comp Headers, dual 3" straight through exhaust, Bilstein shocks, custom springs, full poly suspension, American Racing rims, Open Tracker roller spring saddles and shelby drop.

Still to go - Holley Sniper EFI with integrated fuel cell.
merlin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-11-2006, 11:19 AM   #38
MotherNatureVer2
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cArSiK
Hmm you answered the $11,000 question right there - "He assumed". Expensive mistake but im sure Telstra will come to some arangement with him...Great time for telstra inverstors I say :hihi:

James
You dont have to assume with that company .... Been there done that STILL going through it .... not that amount though ......
MotherNatureVer2 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-11-2006, 03:34 PM   #39
sprjenkins
Spr Jenkins
 
sprjenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 597
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EA2BA
The phone call and setup would have been recorded so to prove he understood exactley what he was getting, I doubt he has much recourse to get out of paying the bill
I highly doubt they are going to say oh sorry about that you didnt reliase here let me wipe that for you.

Some arguement could be made that a new customer should have been notified earlier as to the usage on the phone and possible ability to pay the impending bill, but I don't see this as much of an arguement at the end of the day.

So the Telco say they did send it, he never followed up on not receiving it then, ignorance is unfortunately no excuse.
As I said further up the page, it doesn't matter if he got the contract or not, that is not of importance. What is of importance is what was in the contract, if he was made fully aware of any possibly onerous terms and whether he had the capacity to fully understand it.

It is the responsibility of Telstra to prove that he fully understood, not the other way around. From what was said in the first post, the guy on the phone was vague and misleading.

Seriously, I didn't go to uni and study contract law for nothing guys, read the posts, if what he stated in the first post was true, on the face of it it sounds like he has a good case.
sprjenkins is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-11-2006, 03:47 PM   #40
XCSEDAN
i'm baaaack....
 
XCSEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: workin on something
Posts: 4,460
Default

get him to go to slater and gorden, they know what they are doing, and theres that no win no fee policy, i rekon they will find a loop hole, especially if theres advertising/money in it for them....
i really feel dorry for your mate, but how the hell could you sign up to a deal over the phone?
has he received a written contract or disclosement statement of any kind?
XCSEDAN is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-11-2006, 03:55 PM   #41
Tiga_EL
Banned
 
Tiga_EL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: KNOX
Posts: 1,269
Default

Basically hes screwed. Simple rule is nothing is ever free in this world, especially not phone contracts which are offered to you by FOB's.
Tiga_EL is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL