|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Bar For non Automotive Related Chat |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-06-2020, 08:38 PM | #11 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 388
|
While this sounds a bit severe (depending where one sits in the domestic housing system) and the 'index of affordability" currently sits around 7 in the major capital cities, it was a lot better for first home buyers when it was 4-5.( a ratio variously calculated, but for example cost of house/average adult wage.) However the housing market is very complex location, interest rates, population growth and taxpayer funded grants among other factors feed into the mix.
It always appears that the domestic building industry is the major employer in Australia, remember John Howards "housing led recovery" well are we still looking for that ? Here in Perth, the last 20 years has seen a dramatic simplification of house construction, requiring a lot less on site skill and a lot of frills have been cut out. Personally I would prefer to see government's investing tax payers' contributions in either infrastructure or in industries which provide a developmental progression of skill/knowledge levels for employees. |
||