View Single Post
Old 24-08-2014, 10:37 AM   #118
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default Re: What do you consider to be a fast 400m time?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dillonm View Post
Block, rods, pistons, windage tray, sump, ported heads, cams, 2.4L Wipple Supercharger (14lb), intercooler, heatshielded 1cm thick gasket between heads and manifold, larger plenum chamber, dual throttle body, 60lb injectors pump and surge tank, Xforce 3" exhaust system incl extractors, XCal 2 with an ordinary tune (or driver) (soon to be XCal 4 with a new tuner! (same driver)) 70000 plus cost of car!!

I'm guessing you're manually shifting, so under 12 is reasonable shifting.

Those mods and that boost with the whipple you should be running high 120s maybe 130 through the trap? If you haven't got mid 400 rwkw need new tuner.

I've done 11.8 on nitto invo 255s, and 11.4 on et streets with the manual with around 450, trapping at 128.

Any b series running sub 12 is impressive, you should be happy with yours, don't chase faster ETs.
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.
tex is offline   Reply With Quote